🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be cut by more than half, following a divisive law change that forced local governments to put the fate of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple councillors depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the choice to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often devoted considerable time generating local support and urging their local governments to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, stating local residents should decide whether to establish Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had created a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums alongside the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas against guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating local democratic control.”

Critics however have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has stated it wants to end “race-based” policies, and asserts it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – most cities mandated to hold referendums supported Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to create different wards – including countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 regions that chose to retain their seats.